T-Model VERSION 8.0

 

Fingerprint Identification Based on Match Probability and Relevant Population

  

Last Update:  March 9, 2010

Quality of Agreement - Level II

Ridge Formation Type and Ridge Path Agreement  

In order to refine quantitative-qualitative values for the agreement of ridge formations found in two impressions, a quality of agreement assessment scale is used based on reduced levels of agreement between level II ridge formation shapes and positions.

A ridge formation type, i.e. ending ridge, bifurcation, scar, and so on, is a class characteristic that does not define the many ways it may slant, curve or angle.  For example, one ending ridge unit may end with a sharp point while another may end with a flat edge.  As a result, pairs of corresponding ridge formations in two impressions that fail to display precise or relative agreement in ridge shape and/or position should be subject to reduction.  

A ridge feature quality of agreement grade scale was designed to assign reduction factors to pairs of "corresponding" ridge features in two impressions displaying reduced levels of quality of agreement (see below table).

Agreement of Ridge Type (Connectivity)

The T-Model defines agreement of "ridge feature type" based on whether or not the ridge units display similar connectivity or non-connectivity characteristics.  For example, an ending ridge unit does not (by definition) display connectivity with an adjacent ridge, however a bifurcating ridge unit does display connectivity.

 

Agreement of Ridge Path (Slant/Angle)

For purposes of simplicity, the T-Model defines the agreement between ridge formation shapes in two impressions in terms of relative similar slant and/or angle, which may be supported by physical measurement (if needed). 

It is significant to note here that relative level II ridge path agreement should not be confused with level III ridge unit width and ridge unit edge contour in agreement.   The agreement of level III ridge detail should expand the quantitative weight for a continuous ridge unit in agreement (pending validation studies this Level III value is tentatively set at 1.15).


Agreement of Spatial Relationship to Nearest Neighbor

Rotational Agreement between Ridge Formations

Pending extended experimentation to define rotational friction ridge skin thresholds utilizing a large sample size and similar design methodology as employed during experiments performed by Alice Maceo [97], agreement of spatial relationship, e.g., in terms of falling within rotational friction ridge skin threshold tolerances to include) between nearest Level II ridge feature neighbors is determined by professional judgment, training and experience of the examiner.

Distal Agreement between Ridge Formations

Agreement of spatial relationship (e.g., in terms of falling within distal, e.g., stretch and/or compression, friction ridge skin threshold tolerances to include) between nearest Level II ridge feature neighbors is determined a distal difference (from exemplar to latent) as not to exceed 20%.  Based on experiment, it has been determined that 20% is the maximum friction ridge skin stretch and compression tolerance threshold for normal friction ridge skin (see Friction Skin Elasticity).  As a result, any distal measure between nearest neighbors that falls outside of this stretch or compression threshold is deemed to be not in agreement and therefore subject to reduction.

It is significant to note here that in general meticulous measurements are unnecessary unless the agreement is “borderline” or fails to speak for itself.


NEXT PAGE >>> 

Example

A diminishing area ending ridge in a latent fingerprint slants slightly to the right.  The ending ridge counterpart in the exemplar is straight or slants slightly to the left.  The ridge feature type in the latent and exemplar are the same.  The positional agreement to the nearest 3 neighbors for each all agree.  As a result thequaity of agreement grade is "B2" or "Above Average" and the reduction factor is subsequently defined as .75.

The initial value for the diminishing area ending ridge is defined as 10.  Based on a qualitative reduction factor of .75, the total value for the pair of diminishing area ending ridges is refined to 7.5.



 

The T-Model © 2008 (Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike 3.0 United States License) is presented by the author alone and not his employer.  This license allows the reader to download, redistribute, translate, refine, change, and build upon this work non-commercially, as long as any license for new creations are under these identical terms. All new work based on the author’s will carry the same license, so any derivatives will also be non-commercial in nature.

  

T-Model © 2008      Some Rights Reserved